Review




Structured Review

QED Bioscience anti-ror2 ab
ROR expression in OC stroma. (A) Representative images of stromal ROR1 (top panel) and <t>ROR2</t> (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. ROR1 staining did not have strong expression in the stroma, and therefore, no representative figure of score 3 is shown (NA). (B) ROR expression in the stroma depicted by histological subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.
Anti Ror2 Ab, supplied by QED Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-ror2 ab/product/QED Bioscience
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-ror2 ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars

Images

1) Product Images from "Distinct Patterns of Stromal and Tumor Expression of ROR1 and ROR2 in Histological Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer 1 "

Article Title: Distinct Patterns of Stromal and Tumor Expression of ROR1 and ROR2 in Histological Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer 1

Journal: Translational Oncology

doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.01.014

ROR expression in OC stroma. (A) Representative images of stromal ROR1 (top panel) and ROR2 (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. ROR1 staining did not have strong expression in the stroma, and therefore, no representative figure of score 3 is shown (NA). (B) ROR expression in the stroma depicted by histological subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.
Figure Legend Snippet: ROR expression in OC stroma. (A) Representative images of stromal ROR1 (top panel) and ROR2 (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. ROR1 staining did not have strong expression in the stroma, and therefore, no representative figure of score 3 is shown (NA). (B) ROR expression in the stroma depicted by histological subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.

Techniques Used: Expressing, Staining

ROR expression in OC tumor. (A) Representative images of tumor ROR1 (top panel) and ROR2 (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. (B) ROR expression in the tumor depicted by subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.
Figure Legend Snippet: ROR expression in OC tumor. (A) Representative images of tumor ROR1 (top panel) and ROR2 (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. (B) ROR expression in the tumor depicted by subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.

Techniques Used: Expressing

ROR expression relationship in tumor and stroma. Each panel represents number of tumor ROR expression scores for each stroma score ( x -axis, ROR S_0, ROR S_1, ROR S_2 and ROR S_3). Tumor ROR scores are represented by shading and distribution listed underneath. Each graph is paired with a representative image of the overall pattern of expression for that subtype. (A) ROR1 tumor and stroma expression in clear cell OC showed overall low stroma intensity but high tumor intensity. (B) ROR2 expression was overall low in both tumor and stroma in clear cell OC. (C) ROR1 expression in endometrioid OC was overall strong in tumor cells and weak in stroma. (D) ROR2 expression in endometrioid OC was very strong in tumor cells and absent in stroma. (E) ROR1 expression in mucinous OC was high in tumor and low in stroma. (F) ROR2 expression in mucinous OC was overall weak in both tumor and stroma. (G) ROR1 expression in serous tumor increased as stroma expression increased, but overall expression was mid to low. (H) ROR2 expression in serous OC tumor decreased as stroma expression increased. All cases with a stromal score of 3 exhibited absent tumor expression.
Figure Legend Snippet: ROR expression relationship in tumor and stroma. Each panel represents number of tumor ROR expression scores for each stroma score ( x -axis, ROR S_0, ROR S_1, ROR S_2 and ROR S_3). Tumor ROR scores are represented by shading and distribution listed underneath. Each graph is paired with a representative image of the overall pattern of expression for that subtype. (A) ROR1 tumor and stroma expression in clear cell OC showed overall low stroma intensity but high tumor intensity. (B) ROR2 expression was overall low in both tumor and stroma in clear cell OC. (C) ROR1 expression in endometrioid OC was overall strong in tumor cells and weak in stroma. (D) ROR2 expression in endometrioid OC was very strong in tumor cells and absent in stroma. (E) ROR1 expression in mucinous OC was high in tumor and low in stroma. (F) ROR2 expression in mucinous OC was overall weak in both tumor and stroma. (G) ROR1 expression in serous tumor increased as stroma expression increased, but overall expression was mid to low. (H) ROR2 expression in serous OC tumor decreased as stroma expression increased. All cases with a stromal score of 3 exhibited absent tumor expression.

Techniques Used: Expressing

Survival proportions of ROR stroma expression. (A): Kaplan-Meier curve representing PFS of patients (serous subtype only) with both ROR1 and ROR2 stroma positivity (red) and ROR1 and ROR2 stromal absence (blue). (B) Kaplan Meier curve representing OS of patients (serous subtype only) with both ROR1 and ROR2 stroma positivity (red) and ROR1 and ROR2 stromal absence (blue).
Figure Legend Snippet: Survival proportions of ROR stroma expression. (A): Kaplan-Meier curve representing PFS of patients (serous subtype only) with both ROR1 and ROR2 stroma positivity (red) and ROR1 and ROR2 stromal absence (blue). (B) Kaplan Meier curve representing OS of patients (serous subtype only) with both ROR1 and ROR2 stroma positivity (red) and ROR1 and ROR2 stromal absence (blue).

Techniques Used: Expressing

Tracking ROR expression in individual case studies. (A) ROR1 expression in epithelial/tumor cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (B) ROR1 expression in stromal cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (C): ROR2 expression in epithelial/tumor cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (D) ROR2 expression in stromal cells in individual cases as indicated by indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (E) Representative images of ROR1 (left panel) and ROR2 (right panel) in case studies, with noticeable ROR2 expression in stromal components in primary and metastatic samples. (F) Representative image of case ID0681 recurrence showing diffuse and strong ROR2 expression in tumor and stroma.
Figure Legend Snippet: Tracking ROR expression in individual case studies. (A) ROR1 expression in epithelial/tumor cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (B) ROR1 expression in stromal cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (C): ROR2 expression in epithelial/tumor cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (D) ROR2 expression in stromal cells in individual cases as indicated by indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (E) Representative images of ROR1 (left panel) and ROR2 (right panel) in case studies, with noticeable ROR2 expression in stromal components in primary and metastatic samples. (F) Representative image of case ID0681 recurrence showing diffuse and strong ROR2 expression in tumor and stroma.

Techniques Used: Expressing



Similar Products

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology 374174 rrid ab 10989358
374174 Rrid Ab 10989358, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/374174 rrid ab 10989358/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
374174 rrid ab 10989358 - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

90
QED Bioscience anti-ror2 ab
ROR expression in OC stroma. (A) Representative images of stromal ROR1 (top panel) and <t>ROR2</t> (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. ROR1 staining did not have strong expression in the stroma, and therefore, no representative figure of score 3 is shown (NA). (B) ROR expression in the stroma depicted by histological subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.
Anti Ror2 Ab, supplied by QED Bioscience, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 90/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/anti-ror2 ab/product/QED Bioscience
Average 90 stars, based on 1 article reviews
anti-ror2 ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
90/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

93
Santa Cruz Biotechnology antibodies ab
ROR expression in OC stroma. (A) Representative images of stromal ROR1 (top panel) and <t>ROR2</t> (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. ROR1 staining did not have strong expression in the stroma, and therefore, no representative figure of score 3 is shown (NA). (B) ROR expression in the stroma depicted by histological subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.
Antibodies Ab, supplied by Santa Cruz Biotechnology, used in various techniques. Bioz Stars score: 93/100, based on 1 PubMed citations. ZERO BIAS - scores, article reviews, protocol conditions and more
https://www.bioz.com/result/antibodies ab/product/Santa Cruz Biotechnology
Average 93 stars, based on 1 article reviews
antibodies ab - by Bioz Stars, 2026-03
93/100 stars
  Buy from Supplier

Image Search Results


ROR expression in OC stroma. (A) Representative images of stromal ROR1 (top panel) and ROR2 (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. ROR1 staining did not have strong expression in the stroma, and therefore, no representative figure of score 3 is shown (NA). (B) ROR expression in the stroma depicted by histological subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.

Journal: Translational Oncology

Article Title: Distinct Patterns of Stromal and Tumor Expression of ROR1 and ROR2 in Histological Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer 1

doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.01.014

Figure Lengend Snippet: ROR expression in OC stroma. (A) Representative images of stromal ROR1 (top panel) and ROR2 (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. ROR1 staining did not have strong expression in the stroma, and therefore, no representative figure of score 3 is shown (NA). (B) ROR expression in the stroma depicted by histological subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.

Article Snippet: Sections were stained with Anti-ROR1 Ab (Abcam #135669) or Anti-ROR2 Ab (QED Biosciences, #34045) both at a 1:100 dilution in addition to a negative IgG control, and counterstained with hematoxylin.

Techniques: Expressing, Staining

ROR expression in OC tumor. (A) Representative images of tumor ROR1 (top panel) and ROR2 (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. (B) ROR expression in the tumor depicted by subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.

Journal: Translational Oncology

Article Title: Distinct Patterns of Stromal and Tumor Expression of ROR1 and ROR2 in Histological Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer 1

doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.01.014

Figure Lengend Snippet: ROR expression in OC tumor. (A) Representative images of tumor ROR1 (top panel) and ROR2 (bottom panel) IHC, from a score of 0 to 3. (B) ROR expression in the tumor depicted by subtype. Each pie chart represents percentage of samples and ROR score per subtype. Scores of 0 to 3 colored white, light gray, gray, and dark gray, respectively.

Article Snippet: Sections were stained with Anti-ROR1 Ab (Abcam #135669) or Anti-ROR2 Ab (QED Biosciences, #34045) both at a 1:100 dilution in addition to a negative IgG control, and counterstained with hematoxylin.

Techniques: Expressing

ROR expression relationship in tumor and stroma. Each panel represents number of tumor ROR expression scores for each stroma score ( x -axis, ROR S_0, ROR S_1, ROR S_2 and ROR S_3). Tumor ROR scores are represented by shading and distribution listed underneath. Each graph is paired with a representative image of the overall pattern of expression for that subtype. (A) ROR1 tumor and stroma expression in clear cell OC showed overall low stroma intensity but high tumor intensity. (B) ROR2 expression was overall low in both tumor and stroma in clear cell OC. (C) ROR1 expression in endometrioid OC was overall strong in tumor cells and weak in stroma. (D) ROR2 expression in endometrioid OC was very strong in tumor cells and absent in stroma. (E) ROR1 expression in mucinous OC was high in tumor and low in stroma. (F) ROR2 expression in mucinous OC was overall weak in both tumor and stroma. (G) ROR1 expression in serous tumor increased as stroma expression increased, but overall expression was mid to low. (H) ROR2 expression in serous OC tumor decreased as stroma expression increased. All cases with a stromal score of 3 exhibited absent tumor expression.

Journal: Translational Oncology

Article Title: Distinct Patterns of Stromal and Tumor Expression of ROR1 and ROR2 in Histological Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer 1

doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.01.014

Figure Lengend Snippet: ROR expression relationship in tumor and stroma. Each panel represents number of tumor ROR expression scores for each stroma score ( x -axis, ROR S_0, ROR S_1, ROR S_2 and ROR S_3). Tumor ROR scores are represented by shading and distribution listed underneath. Each graph is paired with a representative image of the overall pattern of expression for that subtype. (A) ROR1 tumor and stroma expression in clear cell OC showed overall low stroma intensity but high tumor intensity. (B) ROR2 expression was overall low in both tumor and stroma in clear cell OC. (C) ROR1 expression in endometrioid OC was overall strong in tumor cells and weak in stroma. (D) ROR2 expression in endometrioid OC was very strong in tumor cells and absent in stroma. (E) ROR1 expression in mucinous OC was high in tumor and low in stroma. (F) ROR2 expression in mucinous OC was overall weak in both tumor and stroma. (G) ROR1 expression in serous tumor increased as stroma expression increased, but overall expression was mid to low. (H) ROR2 expression in serous OC tumor decreased as stroma expression increased. All cases with a stromal score of 3 exhibited absent tumor expression.

Article Snippet: Sections were stained with Anti-ROR1 Ab (Abcam #135669) or Anti-ROR2 Ab (QED Biosciences, #34045) both at a 1:100 dilution in addition to a negative IgG control, and counterstained with hematoxylin.

Techniques: Expressing

Survival proportions of ROR stroma expression. (A): Kaplan-Meier curve representing PFS of patients (serous subtype only) with both ROR1 and ROR2 stroma positivity (red) and ROR1 and ROR2 stromal absence (blue). (B) Kaplan Meier curve representing OS of patients (serous subtype only) with both ROR1 and ROR2 stroma positivity (red) and ROR1 and ROR2 stromal absence (blue).

Journal: Translational Oncology

Article Title: Distinct Patterns of Stromal and Tumor Expression of ROR1 and ROR2 in Histological Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer 1

doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.01.014

Figure Lengend Snippet: Survival proportions of ROR stroma expression. (A): Kaplan-Meier curve representing PFS of patients (serous subtype only) with both ROR1 and ROR2 stroma positivity (red) and ROR1 and ROR2 stromal absence (blue). (B) Kaplan Meier curve representing OS of patients (serous subtype only) with both ROR1 and ROR2 stroma positivity (red) and ROR1 and ROR2 stromal absence (blue).

Article Snippet: Sections were stained with Anti-ROR1 Ab (Abcam #135669) or Anti-ROR2 Ab (QED Biosciences, #34045) both at a 1:100 dilution in addition to a negative IgG control, and counterstained with hematoxylin.

Techniques: Expressing

Tracking ROR expression in individual case studies. (A) ROR1 expression in epithelial/tumor cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (B) ROR1 expression in stromal cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (C): ROR2 expression in epithelial/tumor cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (D) ROR2 expression in stromal cells in individual cases as indicated by indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (E) Representative images of ROR1 (left panel) and ROR2 (right panel) in case studies, with noticeable ROR2 expression in stromal components in primary and metastatic samples. (F) Representative image of case ID0681 recurrence showing diffuse and strong ROR2 expression in tumor and stroma.

Journal: Translational Oncology

Article Title: Distinct Patterns of Stromal and Tumor Expression of ROR1 and ROR2 in Histological Subtypes of Epithelial Ovarian Cancer 1

doi: 10.1016/j.tranon.2017.01.014

Figure Lengend Snippet: Tracking ROR expression in individual case studies. (A) ROR1 expression in epithelial/tumor cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (B) ROR1 expression in stromal cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (C): ROR2 expression in epithelial/tumor cells in individual cases as indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (D) ROR2 expression in stromal cells in individual cases as indicated by indicated by colored dots (blue = normal, red = primary, green = metastatic samples). Y -axis represents ROR expression score, and x -axis represents individual patient. (E) Representative images of ROR1 (left panel) and ROR2 (right panel) in case studies, with noticeable ROR2 expression in stromal components in primary and metastatic samples. (F) Representative image of case ID0681 recurrence showing diffuse and strong ROR2 expression in tumor and stroma.

Article Snippet: Sections were stained with Anti-ROR1 Ab (Abcam #135669) or Anti-ROR2 Ab (QED Biosciences, #34045) both at a 1:100 dilution in addition to a negative IgG control, and counterstained with hematoxylin.

Techniques: Expressing